this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
117 points (88.7% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2592 readers
199 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I figured we'd need to track the criminal down to a specific contry and state and then ask a lawyer to make sure. We're super strict here. If someone uses the voice recorder app or takes a video with sound in a private conversation, that's already a serious thing. Of course similar restrictions apply to phone calls, letters and electronic conversation.

Reading US law isn't easy for me, I mean there's always a lot involved and then there are laws on two or three levels plus exemptions and additional rules... I wonder if such a freedom in a one party state applies to people like whistleblowers and other unruly people as well...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

On paper, whistleblowers have federal protection from prosecution. In reality, however, if you blow the whistle on a rich person, a corporation, or the government, the government will go out of its way to punish you and make an example. See Edward Snowden, who is still wanted by the government, despite having revealed the government was engaged in what was then highly illegal espionage against their own citizens. The government responded by making that invasion of privacy legal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course similar restrictions apply to phone calls, letters and electronic conversation.

I am sure US mega corps are complying and the law is enforced against them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Not sure, I've never worked for an US mega corp. And those really don't seem to like the law, or worker unions who start complaining and blow it up once someone gets mistreated/surveilled by their employer... Honestly, I'm not sure where we're at, overall. I've read about both things happen, corporations getting sued / fined and getting away with exploiting their employees.