this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
225 points (98.3% liked)

AnarchyChess

5588 readers
137 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25112863

Source unknown, some sites assign it to Oppressive Silence comics by Ethan Vincent. But that website in the corner is shady

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree. I think the game is more interesting if it's a new game after the other won

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ratings matter, though. A stalemate means your rating doesn't decrease as much as it would have if you'd lost, and you get to take some of your opponent's rating in the process.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, and a stalemate is not good gameplay. Rating for the stake of finding out who is best as a competition often means sacrificing some of the fun because the rules would be abused. I don't have to change what I think is most fun due to any of those things, and downvoting or explaining why does also not change my opinion. If that is what you want, then explain to me the fun part of spending end game trying to abuse stalemate, and avoiding stalemate versus playing the rest of the game. If the rest is more fun, it's obvious why most give up in this game unless it is a tourney. Because this rule is just not good gameplay in terms of fun and enjoyment. I just think there could be other solutions.