There are quite a few examples of her stretching the limits of legality, yes.

Such as? You said she "arranged plea deals with leniency" et cetera and I'm curious what the other ones were.

Well, this is where I firmly disagree, so we can end the discussion here. This is the sort of approach that benefits only the most wealthy, and firmly punishes anyone without the wealth to get the best lawyers possible.

Oh, I wasn't saying the system was at all fair. It's horribly rigged against defendants, with that as just one of the many ways. I'm just saying that the solution of having prosecutors not really try to prosecute, or decide the justice of the case themselves and then prosecute vigorously or not depending on whether they think before trial that the person is guilty, is not a good fix for that system, and it's weird to accuse a prosecutor of being "the worst kind" because she was prosecuting people at the limits of her ability.

I think properly funding and resourcing legal aid, getting rid of cash bail, and removing some of the tools like extended detention before a hearing that prosecutors use to put pressure on people, would all be necessary steps before we have something approaching justice. You just picked kind of a weird part of the system to identify as the problem, I think.

I won't make you continue to talk about it if you don't want.