I'm starting to see stories from Trump voters saying "This isn't what we voted for."
No. It's exactly what you voted for.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 76 points 2 years ago (88 children)

all the people who refused to vote for kamala must be so pleased with how little palestinian genocide is about to happen. aren't they? well? aren't they?

no?

gee it sure sounds like their whole little plan backfired in the worst possible way come to think of it, ACTUALLY.

  • source
  • hideshow 88 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    It's almost like it could have been easily predicted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Yep. As soon as I heard her stance on Israel, I got a sinking feeling. There was such hope and enthusiasm at first, but she just had to pander to AIPAC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    She also muzzled Walz and started being super corporatist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I think the DNC and their consultants did that. I saw an interview with their consultants after the election, and they were all "We have no idea what went wrong", etc. etc. They all think that Trump is some wild anomaly, not that their strategy sucks. Anybody could've told you that people were tired of the status quo, so a status quo candidate would have trouble winning.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Dawg, the democratic party failed to energize it's base by running a center right campaign with a platform of strong boarders, a strong military, and tax cuts. Them failing to get enough votes is there fault for trying to beat voters with the cudgel of trump while offering nothing to most working families. I voted for Kamala, and even I recognize this. I am really tired of seeing a comment like this every time there's a post about trump. The election is over. Rhetoric like this only divides the left further.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Imagine thinking democracy is only your duty if you feel energized by the candidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Imagine being a Democracy and deliberately running an unpopular campaign so the financiers keep the money spigot on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Actually I'm starting to feel convinced the Democrats saw "The Producers" as inspiration.

    "You can make more money with a floploss than a hitwin!"

    As long as they keep losing elections, they can keep making money disappear (via laundering it). They sop up all the donations and laugh all the way to the bank, burning LITERAL BILLIONS OF DOLLARS on their cousin-in-law's "strategy consulting firm" and tons of completely ineffectual "vote blue" spam, and pay themselves six-figure "speaking fees".

    The solution isn't to just stop voting, though. Voting is merely the least inconvenient, easiest to access tool in the toolbox and the people who left it unused are morons no matter how much ELSE they are doing ABOVE AND BEYOND that. Voting is the bare minimum; you have to do that AND local party organizing, civics, community engagement, nominating candidates for local races.

    But if you don't vote TOO, it's like you neglected to wipe your ass. The stink follows you and embarrasses everyone with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Completely irrelevant because

    1. This is what "forcing" the democrats to make a change looks like, all it will ever do is shift the overton window to the right and make things even worse.
    2. What really lost the democrats the election was years of gerrymandering, voter suppression and making it just difficult as fuck to vote in Dem areas.
  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I see it this way. They want to stop the atrocities in Gaza by any means possible. I can't blame them for that, but I can blame them for how they went about doing it.

    Let's boil it down to playing a simple game. You can play by the rules, and play smart, and win. Or, if you don't like the game, you can play a different game and win that one.

    By voting for someone other than Kamala (or not voting) they are inherently playing the game, and playing to lose.

    If you want to play a different game, then you need to do some Luigi shit instead of sitting on your thumbs bitching about things.

    So in the end, they played the game, and they played to lose, and now we're all fucked because of it, and I don't respect that decision at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I don't follow... Kamala would have just held the status quo, so just to have a change in direction the country decided to go to hell?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    It's not like Democratic administrations gave us the voting rights act, gay marriage, interracial marriage, and abortion. Medicare & Medicaid. Ended Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell. The ACA may not be very close to universal healthcare, but it is a huge improvement on what we had, and it decreased the uninsured population by 15-20M.

    There's a lot more to want from a progressive party, but they have, slowly, made things better. Sometimes, the wing nuts claw those improvements back, and "Ratchet Effect," "Both Sides," etc are great propaganda for cowing opposition to the wing nuts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (25 replies)