you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

This is exactly why I've always maintained that the 2nd amendment against tyranny is complete and utter horseshit. There will never, ever, be a case in which civilians can take up arms against the US government and have any remote shot of doing anything. Any tyrannical government will get to where they are with such significant support they will be so ridiculously protected you'd have to take on the entire military and legal branches of the USA.

In 1814 when everyone had a flintlock pistol? Sure. Now? Have fun getting remote drone striked before you even step foot into Washington D.C.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    The Taliban won and they don't have advanced technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Yeah, let's just organize 100,000+ people right under the nose of the US government, on the damn homefront, to overthrow a tyrannical government, all the while being spied on via every backdoor on Earth by the NSA. Good luck and have fun having your house burned down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Let's pretend any of that actually matters and the US government doesn't have a history of losing to locals, and ask the following: what happens if you willingly disarm yourself? Criminals will still have guns, your police will still shoot "less-lethal" rounds into the heads of protesters, and you will still be oppressed.

    What do you get out of this? A fraction of the illusion of safety? And all it cost you was the last defense against oppression anyone has.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Look, I'm not saying to just roll over, but wtf are we supposed to do. The second amendment is there, I don't see anyone utilizing it, and I don't think they ever will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    The 2A is there for you to do things, but it's not only simply about rising up. It's about instrumentalization. When every citizen can be armed "just in case", all you need is for that to statistically compound into a Luigi or two getting three lucky marked shots on the tyrant du jour.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    When CW II kicks off some people will be caught, some people will be thrown in prison, and some people will be killed.

    Remember it's "home of the brave", not "home of the cowards".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments