you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I guess there are no checks and balances that apply?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Sorry, no. We'd need 60 votes in the Senate and a majority on the SCOTUS to stop this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Sorry, no, he meant there are no checks -as in bank checks- because all the balances -as in account balances- are now zero after all the money has now disappeared.

    So, literally, no checks and balances.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Technically, this is the executive branch working within itself.

    Now, the check on executive stupidity to this extreme is impeachment, but that's never gonna happen with the Republican party in charge of both houses of Congress.

  • source
  • parent