Bicycling

2311 readers

35 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

It's mildly infuriating what some municipalities think are “top achievements” when it comes to active transportation goals (lemmy.ca)

submitted 11 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As I was looking at a local municipality's "Community Strategic Plan", they listed some "Top Achievements" for the previous year.

Among them was "Increased bike lanes by 1.01km in 2023."

I mean, seriously? A whole kilometre that was split between two different projects?! /s

Anyone else feel like their municipality is simply doing the bare minimum for cyclists so they can pat themselves on the back?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

In the UK a ‘bike lane’ is almost always just a white line on a road that you could cycle on before.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

I looked into the location of this 1km bike lane (again, split between two different projects in different areas). One is at least connected to existing cycling infrastructure.

The other quite literally leads you to/from a very dangerous main road with no cycling infrastrure to another dangerous road with no cycling infrastructure 🫠

But yes, our bike lanes are generally just paint to make it easier for motorists to know where they shouldn't be parking (but still do).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

But was almost always blocked by a parked car.