Games

17283 readers

578 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Need for Speed will return, EA pledges, but team all-in on Battlefield for now (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 13 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I felt exactly the same. There's just SOMETHING wrong with the Frostbite 3 engine that even now DICE doesn't seem to be able to get physics right. Things feel strongly floaty and delayed.

Up to battlefield 3 everything felt exactly how an fps should be, snappy, fast, and realistic enough. 4 used Frostbite 3 and remember how buggy it was on launch but after years of work is still one of the best they ever made. But somehow 1 and on theres just something off that I just can't put my finger on.

Don't get me wrong, I've put at least several dozen hours into every one of them so it's not like I played a few matches and quit.

But 1942, 2, BC 1 AND 2, 3, and 4 I put hundreds if not thousands of hours into them