Linux Questions

1297 readers

2 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

stay on topic
be nice (no name calling)
do not post long blocks of text such as logs
do not delete your posts
only post questions (no information posts)

Tips for giving and receiving help

be as clear and specific
say thank you if a solution works
verify your solutions before posting them as facts.

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is there anything that could help me memorise the argument order of the ln command? (ma.fellr.net)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Is there anything that could help me memorise the argument order of the ln command?

I'll take anything from little helper phrases over shell extensions to replacements written in Rust. I only use the command occasionally, but I need a fool-proof solution. Do you have any tricks to get it right?

@linuxquestions

#AskFedi #Linux

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I can understand OP's confusion, though.

For move and copy it's pretty certain which is the 'from' and which is the 'to' - the order intuitively makes sense.

For symlinks it's more ambiguous based on your personal mental model.

For example, if you think about symlinks from the perspective of the original file before a link is created, then the original file represents the 'from' and the link is the 'to' (CORRECT)

But if you are thinking from the perspective of using a link after it's created, then you can easily imagine the symlink as the 'from' - because that's where you start when you follow it, and the target file/dir as the 'to' - because that's where you arrive after following it. (INCORRECT)

So I totally get the ambiguity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

You worded that goodly.