213
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mesamunefire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Less than 30 days ago article, hope thats ok. It will be interesting to see the effects of the myriad of websites that are de-listing twitter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, glad to see we're trading the platform that Jack Dorsey previously sold to a fascist for an obscene sum of money for the platform that Jack Dorsey hasn't yet sold to a fascist for an obscene sum of money.

I'm so deeply disappointed that Mastadon isn't taking a larger share of traffic.

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I'm fine with it. We don't need to be the most popular, we just need to be there consistently.

People continue to come over slowly and then they keep engaging. It's not fizzing out so it's been very nice.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I dint care how big we are but its still very disheartening how much critical thinking skills people lack.

Do they really believe it will be better or do they just not care?

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

It's just more convenient it seems to not care about instances

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

Not for everyone. And so for now, I'm confident in the growth of the fediverse in many directions. I've been advocating for the Fediverse since I left reddit, after 12 years, because Meta products had become so toxic. I've had more people than ever before ask me about Pixelfed last week, two of them, IG refugees. Oh and one who'd been on before, and returned to Pixelfed. THREE!!!

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I'd guess they don't care enough. If bsky enshittifies they will just find something else, same as now, but until then they can just ride it out with little to no hassle.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I'm so deeply disappointed that Mastadon isn't taking a larger share of traffic.

It's got George Takei. What more do we need?

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Should note that Jack Dorsey is not part of Bluesky anymore. He left a little while ago

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Did he fully divest any decision making powe and financial interests? Or just the decision making power?

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Dorsey sold it to the public, and Musk bought it from the public.

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

At least it will be really funny if Bluesky just becomes the new Twitter and Musk's 55B loses most of its value

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thats what I bet will happen. Elon is the "fellow kids" meme in a nutshell. He bought an entire platform to look cool, only to make the platform itself stale and broken. I feel bad for the employees that will have that on their resume (or laid off) but what can you do?

At least blue sky has the bridge. It kinda works. I will still be using mastodon/Gotosocial but to others they can use whatever platform they want to talk to me. Including family.

@xmunk @mesamunefire I also dislike Jack Dorsey, but it's false to say that "he sold twitter".
He did not own 50% or more of the companies shares, so he couldn't make that decision by himself.
Additionally, as I just learned from wikipedia, he had already resigned as CEO a year before the sale

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Eugen has admitted, in some ways, that he’s introverted and perhaps didn’t have the skills to create the publicity needed to have it grab general public attention. While I have concerns that the new non-profit will become a Mozilla type entity with too much overhead, hopefully some useful overhead can be put into better marketing the product.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
213 points (97.3% liked)

News

35724 readers
4265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS