Technology

59598 readers

3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Are people interested in multi-client stress tests on routers? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I asked this same question on Reddit and I got zero engagement, so perhaps Lemmy has people that care more about their hardware.

I recently decided to use some of the tools provided by Mr Salter (netburn) and I have to ask the community if you want to see multi-client stress tests (4K streaming, VoIP, web browsing) used on a wireless router or if the single-client iperf tests are good enough. Bear in mind that pretty much all publications that still test their devices (most don't) rely on the single-client test method.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I totally be interested in this sort of testing methodology being published. Maybe in a wiki?

Getting comparable numbers for buffer bloat and queuing would be great for commercial routers. Of course you would want to compare against Enterprise solution so that people know where on the spectrum they're landing.

Full disclosure I roll my own GLI net open WRT router and I enforce different queues for qos seperation.. i.e. downloading and streaming shouldn't interfere with VoIP calls and gaming