this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
1951 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60725 readers
3976 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Space is much more developed. Would need ever improving dynamic proof of personhood tests

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think a web-of-trust-like network could still work pretty well where everyone keeps their own view of the network and their own view of reputation scores. I.e. don't friend people you don't know; unfriend people who you think are bots, or people who friend bots, or just people you don't like. Just looked it up, and wikipedia calls these kinds of mitigation techniques "Social Trust Graphs" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack#Social_trust_graphs . Retroshare kinda uses this model (but I think reputation is just a hard binary, and not reputation scores).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I dont see how that stops bots really. We're post-Turing test. In fact they could even scan previous reputation points allocation there and divise a winning strategy pretty easily.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, don't friend, or put high trust on people you don't know is pretty strong. Due to the "six degrees of separation" phenomenon, it scales pretty easily as well. If you have stupid friends that friend bots you can cut them off all, or just lower your trust in them.

"Post-turing" is pretty strong. People who've spent much time interacting with LLMs can easily spot them. For whatever reason, they all seem to have similar styles of writing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I mean, don’t friend, or put high trust on people you don’t know is pretty strong. Due to the “six degrees of separation” phenomenon, it scales pretty easily as well. If you have stupid friends that friend bots you can cut them off all, or just lower your trust in them.

Know IRL? Seems it would inherently limit discoverability and openness. New users or those outside the immediate social graph would face significant barriers to entry and still vulnerable to manipulation, such as bots infiltrating through unsuspecting friends or malicious actors leveraging connections to gain credibility.

“Post-turing” is pretty strong. People who’ve spent much time interacting with LLMs can easily spot them. For whatever reason, they all seem to have similar styles of writing.

Not the good ones, many conversations online are fleeting. Those tell-tale signs can be removed with the right prompt and context. We're post turing in the sense that in most interactions online people wouldn't be able to tell they were speaking to a bot, especially if they weren't looking - which most aren't.