1170
Proton CEO embraces Trump for "standing up for the little guys" (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
587 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

I like that you start referencing history yourself tho

Please, please tell me you are not referring to highlighting what the guy wrote.

To be honest I don't care what I remind you off. You hallucinate worse than chatGPT, and you seem to have really hard time reading what other people write, both me and Andy Yen.

You are one of the many people whose heart is in the right place, but for some reason feel the need to make stuff up to make their argument more compelling. It's not an "obsession for semantics", it's an allergy for bullshit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children)

    First and foremost from the start you literally made no sense. That shift nonsense is like an asspie's fever dream. It may be that you are ESL, or just lack a general grasp on conversation.

    Conversations are dynamic and constantly change. The entire time you were stuck at the begining unable to move on or offer actual real opinions. You feigned it is not my argument, but the reality is you just have nothing.

    Speaking of Chatgpt perhaps you should use it to help with your responses. Reword everything of course. I would much rather talk with a language model than someone who wants to attempt to argue semantics.

    You are one of those people who have nothing to say. An apologist without an opinion who just latches onto whatever comes along. But I think your heart is in the right place. Like I said, I think we probably agree on everything.

    Everything except this dumb motherfucker trying to pretend that it is opposite day. God damn the sides have flipped nonsense and now the Republicans are going after big business has to be one of the stupidest takes I have ever heard.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    unable to move on or offer actual real opinions

    You are so wise. It only you simply acknowledged the first point without moving the goalpost and adding random stuff everytime.

    I have never been interested in discussing opinions with you, I wanted to point out that your line of reasoning made no sense. However, you couldn't critically reflect on your fallacy and you tried making stuff up to drag me into a conversation.

    attempt to argue semantics

    I didn't attempt, I did. And I didn't argue semantics, I argue logic.

    Anyway, thanks. Cya

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Like I said it is a conversation. It is dynamic and it changes. I explained you have nothing, no need to climb on your high horse and ride off all pissy.

    You see you were just wrong from the beginning. I still chose to share my opinions and time with you regardless of your lack of reciprocation.

    I do appreciate you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    A conversation you never decided to engage, only to derail because apparently for you it must be really hard to say that you didn't read the post completely, or that you missed something. You did clear mistakes (factual, logical, not opinions) in such a brief conversation, but somehow you are acting all wise "conversations change". Sure they do, when you want to change topic because saying " yep, in retrospective it was stupid mentioning the last 50 years and I didn't consider how much the argument I wanted to debate relies on a supposed change that I disagree happened". This is pretty much all there was to say. I did for you, so now I can go live in peace.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Yes I was stupid to bring up the fact you would have to ignore that for the last fifty years the Republican party has been on the same trajectory. This is in reference to the Southern Strategy and it is the driving force behind their party to this day.

    This fucking tard burger says there has been a change in the last ten. That the sides have flipped and now Republicans represent the little guy.

    What I said was an obviously sarcastic comment because this foreigner has no fucking clue about what is going on politically in the US.

    As I already said. In order to believe what Andy and company have said you would have to ignore the last 50 years of the Republican party and also be lobotomized.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent