1170
Proton CEO embraces Trump for "standing up for the little guys" (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
587 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

unable to move on or offer actual real opinions

You are so wise. It only you simply acknowledged the first point without moving the goalpost and adding random stuff everytime.

I have never been interested in discussing opinions with you, I wanted to point out that your line of reasoning made no sense. However, you couldn't critically reflect on your fallacy and you tried making stuff up to drag me into a conversation.

attempt to argue semantics

I didn't attempt, I did. And I didn't argue semantics, I argue logic.

Anyway, thanks. Cya

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Like I said it is a conversation. It is dynamic and it changes. I explained you have nothing, no need to climb on your high horse and ride off all pissy.

    You see you were just wrong from the beginning. I still chose to share my opinions and time with you regardless of your lack of reciprocation.

    I do appreciate you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    A conversation you never decided to engage, only to derail because apparently for you it must be really hard to say that you didn't read the post completely, or that you missed something. You did clear mistakes (factual, logical, not opinions) in such a brief conversation, but somehow you are acting all wise "conversations change". Sure they do, when you want to change topic because saying " yep, in retrospective it was stupid mentioning the last 50 years and I didn't consider how much the argument I wanted to debate relies on a supposed change that I disagree happened". This is pretty much all there was to say. I did for you, so now I can go live in peace.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Yes I was stupid to bring up the fact you would have to ignore that for the last fifty years the Republican party has been on the same trajectory. This is in reference to the Southern Strategy and it is the driving force behind their party to this day.

    This fucking tard burger says there has been a change in the last ten. That the sides have flipped and now Republicans represent the little guy.

    What I said was an obviously sarcastic comment because this foreigner has no fucking clue about what is going on politically in the US.

    As I already said. In order to believe what Andy and company have said you would have to ignore the last 50 years of the Republican party and also be lobotomized.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent