this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
35 points (94.9% liked)

hexbear

10310 readers
248 users here now

Hexbear Proposals chapo.chat matrix room.

This will be a place for site proposals and discussion before implementation on the site.
Every proposal will also be mirrored into a pinned post on the hexbear community.

Any other ideas for helping to integrate the two spaces are welcome to be commented here or messaged to me directly.

Within Hexbear Proposals you can see the history of all site proposals and react to them, indicating a vote for or against a proposal.

Sending messages will be restricted to verified and active hexbear accounts older than 1 month with their matrix id in their hexbear user profile.

All top level messages within the channel must be a Proposals (idea for changing the site), Feedback (regarding non-technical aspects of the site, for technical please use https://hexbear.net/c/feedback), or Appeals (regarding admin/moderator actions).

Discussion regarding these will be within nested threads under the post.

To gain matrix verification, all you need to do is navigate to my hexbear userprofile and click the send a secure private message including your hexbear username.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know, but this comment from @[email protected] has given me some stuff to think about.

People should not think less of you on the base of the amount of sex you have, and you shouldn't either.

This is a nice thought, but insults based on amount of sex are absurdly common. I have seen quite a few people on this site who still do these insults, and it doesn't get removed when I report it. The incel article from a while go was about how we should critique incels for their misogyny rather than them failing to have sex, I see this as pretty similar to the arguments about not body-shaming fascists in that most of the people who will get hit by the insult are not the actual target. From what I remember, that article good job explaining why these insults are harmful and how they hurt a lot of people who they really shouldn't, unfortunately the discussion on that post was very off topic. In my experience, most people who have sex fail to recognize that not everyone who is celibate is an incel ("If so many terrible people have sex and you can't, that must mean you are worse than they are!").

I would say that insults based on amount of sex a person has should not be allowed, but I am very pessimistic about this actually leading to a change in site culture.

Once again, please assume good faith, even if you disagree with the take. If you think I mean something weirdly reactionairy by this post, ask me wether that is what I mean, instead of just saying that's what I mean please.
I don't want this to become a strugglesession, I just feel like this would be a good discussion to have. If this does become hostile, then please lock/remove it mods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, but we should ban using the -oid suffix since it originates from an ableist term and we've banned other suffixes with similar origins.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think that is true unless I’m missing some context. It’s a widely used suffix in English.

I assume you’re referring to

cw slurschizoid
?

I think a one-off ban of that term is sufficient…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The third definition on that page describes its use as a derogative. I'm fairly sure it originates from

CW:ableismm*****loid, an archaic ableist term.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see, well I would support banning terms like that, when the implication is basically “lesser human”. Just not trying to get banned when talking about asteroids and hemorrhoids lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's my concern as well. There are many modern scientific, engineering, and technical terms that use older slurs in whole or in part, yet in their modern context are not at all slurs.

I'm wondering if there could be some sort of "soft" word filter. Instead of instantly replacing certain words, perhaps there could be an "auto-report" to mods about certain words. They could then make their own decision on whether the word was appropriate in the context of the discussion on which it was used.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's not like it's absolute, a word doesn't have to be automatically filtered for it not to be allowed here. "Bitch" isn't filtered, but comments using it in a misogynistic way are still removed. It's pretty easy to determine whether a comment has an ableist insult or the word "asteroid" in it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I completely disagree. It's used in a lot of technical and scientific circumstances. Such as describing Earth not as a sphere, but as an oblate spheroid.

There's other terms on the wordfilter list that I have issues with, such as d=ge=erate, for the same reason. "D=ge=erate matter" is a very specific term in physics used to describe a type of matter commonly found in extremely dense objects like white dwarfs and neutron stars.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I didn't think ”in a derogative way” needed to be specified because people could figure it out from the context, but maybe it should've been. Obviously I'm not asking for *oid to be added to the slur filter, just that using ableist terms ending in -oid shouldn't be allowed.