this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
-28 points (24.1% liked)

Conservative

410 readers
79 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They aren't even close. But do go off.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You're right, Trump has done no where near the amount of damage that the Clinton dtnasty has. I mean NAFTA alone ruined tens of millions of Americans lives and it's effects can still be felt in the dying towns across the US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Clinton dynasty? Rofl. Trump doing no where near the amount of damage. Lol nafta ruining lives? Omg. You should do stand up. You're FUNNY making stuff up like that!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry you've never been poor and never have known a blue collar worker. Hopefully you get out your privileged little tower soon and meet people. They'll be more than happy to tell you why NAFTA encouraging off shoring of a lot of good paying jobs ruined their parents' and their neighbors' lives.

It was quite literally the most economically devastating bit of legislation in the 90s and 00s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Swing and a miss! I'll give you a little hint, it's not nafta to blame. It's Reagan but nice try!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reagan signed NAFTA into law allowing companies to get tax breaks for offshoring?

Weird. Usually you people deny neoliberalism as a concept since it reveals there's no difference in the economic goals of either major party given they're the same ideology.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nope, not what I said either. Also what do you mean "you people"? Funny that they don't have the same ideology, but you say they do. Curious.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, you're just a troll account, got it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Heavens no. But that's the impression I got from you