you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 76 points 2 years ago (27 children)

Based on the comments it looks like Europeans weren't ready to hear some of these things. 😉 Let me pile on...

Innovation in Europe is stiffled due to a risk-averse culture, complex regulatory environments, fragmented markets across different countries, limited access to venture capital, and a tendency for established companies to be less receptive to new ideas from startups, making it harder for innovative companies to scale up (compared to the US).

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    at least the fragmented markets, limited venture capital and closed-mindedness of established compagnies are relatively well known and recognised, wouldn't say Europeans aren't ready to hear it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I was actually thinking the first two were the more detrimental, and are the reason behind lack of VC and closed minded companies. The fragmented markets is irritating, but overcomeable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    yeah I think I'd agree with that, hut I'm risk-averse myself so can't go pointing blame at others

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    The opposite could maybe be said of the US: due to our crazy-pants lack of financial security, people are willing to do risky things, which, when successful, can drive innovation. I grew up in this culture, so it doesn't make me uncomfortable, but understand it isn't for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    regulatory environments

    Regulations are written in the blood of the victims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    And other regulations are written by the lobbyists of big companies.

    Here in Germany we have so many regulations that don't help anyone, except big companies who can circumvent or deal with them.

    I don't want to reduce environmental or worker protection, but we need to simplify a lot of regulations so that the time to do the paperwork is reduced, one of the solutions should be good digitalisation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Some are, sure. I think most on Lemmy support those kinds. While I enjoy the effects, USB-C mandates aren’t written in blood, and I suspect the majority of regulations are of that variety.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The USB-C mandate is a direct result of it being actively ignored by Apple. The way to universal chargers, first through micro USB and then USB C was also championed by the EU but only as a loose industry agreement or so. Definitely not enough to reign in Apple which is why it was now made mandatory.

    The main motivation was to reduce electronic waste due to every device having a different charger and often not even standardising in the same company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago*

    I support the mandate. Just pointing out that the whole “blood of victims” thing, while true of some very important regulations, is nonsense for most of them. There were no victims of lightning ports. There was no blood involved in generic Champagne being called Sparkling Wine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Start-ups in the US benefit from an immediate market of 400 million people. The EU should be able to enjoy a similar benefit but you are right about the red tape. Obviously Brexit in the UK was a total anathema to that as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Rather have stifled innovation than innovation running rampant like what the US is doing.

    With stifled innovation you only get through if you have an actual good idea instead of just an idea that makes money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    From what J can see innovation is happening just fine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Tell me one big innovation of the last 30 years where Europe is leading

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (10 children)
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Doesn't really count if you have to google it first to know what it is, that's not what will save the European economy in the future. In the mean time other regions of the world dominate battery technology, battery-electric vehicles, handheld devices, social media, semiconductor technology, quantum computing, and basically the whole internet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Doesn’t really count if you have to google it first to know what it is

    Are you saying that semiconductors and chipset manufacturing is not a critical domain today?

    battery technology

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umicore

    social media

    Ironic as you are using a Lemmy instance based in Austria

    A few other companies in the fields you mentioned:

    • Spotify
    • SAP
    • Volkswagen
    • BMW

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/20-most-valuable-european-tech-221145055.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, and as we all know, feddit.org absolutely dominates the social media market.

    I specifically wrote that in these areas other regions of the world are dominating. I'm well aware that there are some players from the EU in these areas. That's not the point. Europe is not leading in any major development of the last 30 years while in other areas they lose market share to the competition like automotive or space (with the notable exception of aviation).

    Let's look at tech companies. Look at that list and tell me with a straight face that Europe is playing a dominant role:

    https://companiesmarketcap.com/tech/largest-tech-companies-by-market-cap/

    Out of the 100 biggest companies, there are only 10 from the whole continent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    ASML is such an undisputed leader in today’s chip ecosystem that it’s hard to believe the company’s market dominance really only dates back to 2017, when its EUV machine, after 17 years of development, upended the conventional process for making chips.

    It’s also a testament to ASML’s dominance that it is for the most part no longer allowed to sell its most advanced systems to customers in China. Though ASML still does business in China, in 2019, following pressure from the Trump administration, the Dutch government began imposing restrictions on ASML’s exports of EUV machines to China. Those rules were tightened further just last year and now also impose limits on some of the company’s deep-ultraviolet (DUV) machines, which are used to make less highly advanced chips than EUV systems.

    Yet although today everyone is banking on ASML to keep pushing the industry forward, there is speculation that a competitor could emerge from China. Van den Brink was dismissive of this possibility, citing the gap in even last-generation lithography.

    “SMEE are making DUV machines, or at least claim they can,” he told MIT Technology Review, referring to a company that makes the predecessor to EUV lithography technology, and pointed out that ASML still has the dominant market share. The political pressures could mean more progress for China. But getting to the level of complexity involved in ASML’s suite of machines, with low, high, and hyper NA is another matter, he says: “I feel quite comfortable that this will be a long time before they can copy that.”

    https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/04/01/1090393/how-asml-took-over-the-chipmaking-chessboard/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You keep using your phone, and ignoring what tech allows all modern computers to exist. Tech isn't a major industry, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    And Europe is not dominating that industry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Ain't no way you gonna put all of Europe into that statement. You do understand that each country have their own system, policies and regulatory laws?

    The problem here is that what you're saying is maybe true for a handful of countries while completely false and inaccurate for a handful of others.

    We're not one single entity. Your statement is just not accurate as a whole.

  • source
  • parent