this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)
retroNET - Vintage Culture/Websites/Software
1930 readers
14 users here now
Websites, software, games, fads, memes, or any general happenings that used to occur or had originated on computers 20+ years ago.
This community is software and internet focused. For retro hardware discussion try [email protected]
Some Cool Links
Classic Websites: Random Page / Search Engine
cool-retro-term: terminal emulator mimicing old cathode displays
Neocities: webhost homage to Geocities
Webamp / Webamp Desktop / Skin Library: cross-platform re-implementation of Winamp 2.9
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
$5 says the problem is the ad revenue they were living on has dried up and/or dramatically shrunk.
This has happened to a LOT of sites, and a more niche site like newgrounds probably doesn't command high rates, so they have to figure out how to fund themselves now.
Edit: Also, I don't think sites asking you to donate/pay for features is "enshittification". If anything, getting revenue from you, the user, is a hard counter to enshittification.
Enshittification is exploiting you for the benefit of capital: you become the product, and are pimped out to anyone who wants to pay.
If you're the one paying for the service, you're maintaining the relationship as a customer, and you keep the power in that dynamic, which is a power 'free users' on enshittified platforms don't have: you can take your money and leave, and that will actually hurt them.
This isn't globally true, of course - what is? - but telling you they need money to keep the site up and offer you a method to pay and provide something for your money is very very honest compared to what most of big tech pulls.
Yeah, I was applying the term "enshitification" directly to Reddit and Twitter but not to New grounds... Or rather, I had some doubt on whether or not New grounds was the same phenomenon as the others or something more legitimate (and your comment confirms that it's the latter)