you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

It also lets the defense examine "would a killer target the United healthcare CEO specifically because they were personally evil vs a statement against the system?" That's also helpful for a defense angling for a nullification mistrial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Technical question: isn't nullification an innocent verdict, not a mistrial?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I am not a lawyer.

    Nullification is when the jury hands in a verdict of "not guilty", even though there's a preponderance of evidence that the law was indeed broken by the defendant. They basically ignore the Judge's instructions to weigh the evidence and do something else instead. This would trigger an appeal by the prosecution on the basis of mistrial, since the optics on that situation look like something procedural is way off.

    I'm not well-versed in these matters, but I am intrigued by what would happen if this went to appeal. If it went all the way to SCOTUS, or even some appeals court with a crooked judge, that might not go so well for the defendant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You don't get to appeal a not guilty verdict right or wrong its done forever. A mistrial only happens before a verdict is reached so either side could be looking for justification for one if they believe that they stand to lose the case but the judge has to find there is cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment