this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3026 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Chinese President Xi Jinping is not expected to attend Donald Trump’s inauguration despite a personal invitation extended by Trump shortly after Election Day.

This informal invitation, which surprised Beijing and U.S. allies, breaks from standard diplomatic protocol as no foreign head of state has attended a U.S. inauguration since 1874.

China’s ambassador and other officials will represent Beijing instead.

The invitation comes amid tense U.S.-China relations, following a major Chinese-linked hack of U.S. telecoms, raising concerns about the geopolitical implications of Trump’s outreach to Xi.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm not advocating violence, but imagine a timeline where Xi actually attends and an assassin went there to fire at trump, then missed and accidentaly shot at Xi and Xi dies. Like imagine the shitshow lol.

A headline will look like "Suspect accused of assassinating President Xi of China, during an attempt to assassinate President trump"

How is the geopolitical diplomacy ever gonna work this out? Is the China tariffs gonna be tougher and make China even more mad and make them try to assasinate a US president? Or is the tariff gonna go away to ease the tensions, but then conservatives might be mad that he didn't go all tough on China.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why couldn't you have a happy hypothetical where the world is rid of both of those assholes at the same time?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because its funnier to see what trump does with China. Too tough and risk getting himself killed, too soft and his own base turns on him.

Also because its a hypothetical and I don't live in that timeline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Inviting him is already too soft for what his base claimed to want. But they'll of ore anything he does

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)