▲ 662 ▼ Anon meets a girl at a wedding (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] gilarelli@jlai.lu 3 points 2 years ago (19 children) Careful anon, that's how you get a Habsburg child permalink fedilink source hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 72 points 2 years ago (18 children) I mean, probably not with a second cousin, unless you do it for hundreds of years. Greater risk of birth defects if you have children over 30. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah even first cousins are actually not that bad, biologically speaking, if it's only done for one (or probably even two?) generation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably legal in more places than it's illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be honest though, there's always going to be a risk of birth defects if you're having more than 30 kids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago If you have them like 5 at a time, you'll probably get a pretty good crop before age sets in. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Having children after 40 greatly increases chances of birth defects, I can only imagine what happens after hundreds of years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 12 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Hmm, we'll need to ask an elf... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (5 children) And at this point, with all of the toxins from food processing/preservatives and the plastics getting into our bodies, the added risk is probably negligible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (4 children) "Got a rubber?" "Nope, but I've got plenty of microplastics" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Microplastic is stored in the balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's my theory this is what will be what wipes out humanity, not climate change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gilarelli@jlai.lu 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 10 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 72 points 2 years ago (18 children) I mean, probably not with a second cousin, unless you do it for hundreds of years. Greater risk of birth defects if you have children over 30. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah even first cousins are actually not that bad, biologically speaking, if it's only done for one (or probably even two?) generation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably legal in more places than it's illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be honest though, there's always going to be a risk of birth defects if you're having more than 30 kids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago If you have them like 5 at a time, you'll probably get a pretty good crop before age sets in. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Having children after 40 greatly increases chances of birth defects, I can only imagine what happens after hundreds of years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 12 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Hmm, we'll need to ask an elf... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (5 children) And at this point, with all of the toxins from food processing/preservatives and the plastics getting into our bodies, the added risk is probably negligible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (4 children) "Got a rubber?" "Nope, but I've got plenty of microplastics" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Microplastic is stored in the balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's my theory this is what will be what wipes out humanity, not climate change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gilarelli@jlai.lu 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 10 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah even first cousins are actually not that bad, biologically speaking, if it's only done for one (or probably even two?) generation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably legal in more places than it's illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably legal in more places than it's illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably legal in more places than it's illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) To be honest though, there's always going to be a risk of birth defects if you're having more than 30 kids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago If you have them like 5 at a time, you'll probably get a pretty good crop before age sets in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago If you have them like 5 at a time, you'll probably get a pretty good crop before age sets in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Having children after 40 greatly increases chances of birth defects, I can only imagine what happens after hundreds of years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 12 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Hmm, we'll need to ask an elf... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Hmm, we'll need to ask an elf... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (5 children) And at this point, with all of the toxins from food processing/preservatives and the plastics getting into our bodies, the added risk is probably negligible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (4 children) "Got a rubber?" "Nope, but I've got plenty of microplastics" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Microplastic is stored in the balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's my theory this is what will be what wipes out humanity, not climate change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (4 children) "Got a rubber?" "Nope, but I've got plenty of microplastics" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Microplastic is stored in the balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's my theory this is what will be what wipes out humanity, not climate change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Microplastic is stored in the balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's my theory this is what will be what wipes out humanity, not climate change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's my theory this is what will be what wipes out humanity, not climate change. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Slowing ourselves down this way may be for the best. We’re starting to see inverted population age (more older than younger) in some countries, so we’ll need to solve that structural problem at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gilarelli@jlai.lu 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 10 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent