this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
30 points (75.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44144 readers
1240 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have an economics teacher that made this claim in class yesterday. I wanted to know other people’s thoughts about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fractional reserve banking does not mean the debt does not exist. The debt very much exists. Nobody takes out a loan and just sits on it. As soon as the loan is created, goods and services are traded. At the end of the day, each party to downstream transactions can go to the bank and withdraw the balance of their account in cash. The fractional reserve system only works as long as not everyone does this at once.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Except it's new money that's made up, and in the case of student loans, most of that money isn't traded for goods and services, instead more than 3/4s of the money created goes back to the lender.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Looks like we are not going to agree on this, which is okay—I enjoyed the discussion nonetheless. Have a nice day.