this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
425 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36169 readers
516 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let's be civil.

And if you're a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Assuming they catch him

they will catch him. they already have his photo, he is not professional hitman, he can only evade for so long when there is the whole country's law enforcement after him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not even sure if that's the perpetrator.

They are just scrambling to blame anyone at this point. Even low-profile cases have resulted in wrongful convictions, for a high-profile case, they have even higher incentive to just find a scapegoat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not even sure if that’s the perpetrator.

they already know quite a lot, i find it highly unlikely they just released a photo of some random person in same clothes with same bag who just accidentally appeared in multiple places in close vicinity to the crime scene.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/12/05/nyregion/brian-thompson-unitedhealthcare-news

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Law enforcement have shit insurance scams to deal with too. I certainly wouldn't work hard on the case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would say that depends on his resources. And I wouldn't say that the entire country's law enforcement is after him, at least not yet. As of when I'm writing this, I can't find any mentions of anything beyond the NYPD being involved in the investigation.

Normally, you wouldn't even see state level involvement in a local homicide investigation. It just isn't useful. When that does occur, it tends to be because there's a belief the suspect has left the original jurisdiction, or that evidence in other jurisdictions needs to be gathered.

That's extra true for the feds.

Yeah, with this being some corporate fuck that's the victim, if it goes on long enough, those outside agencies will at least "offer" resources, but it isn't going to be happening this soon.

If the guy has resources of his own, particularly if he has somewhere far enough away to go and funds to stay off grid for a while, he could go decades without getting caught, if ever.

Of course, there's still zero information about the guy that's meaningful. He could be planning to turn himself in as a form of martyr, for all we know. Could have been his plan from the start.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

the all country's law enforcement was partially hyperbole, partially not. it already got a lot more manpower than average murder, the system has to protect itself here, because if this goes unpunished, other rich people might be next, and rich people are those who control the system. that is not a conspiracy, that is the way of life, as they say.

now this guy is clearly not a professional, so who is he? he is either someone with personal motive or someone really dedicated to making a social commentary.

if it is the former and he is someone whose close person died because of being denied coverage or something like that, that is a) the way to find him and b) it probably means he doesn't have funds to go hide in his den indefinitely, because he would use such funds towards treatment of the person he is avenging.

if it is the latter, than who knows, but i personally think it is someone described in the last paragraph.