this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
37 points (87.8% liked)

Bicycling

2241 readers
13 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ignoring that my country doesn't allow Idaho Stops, or that my Provincial Government wants to actively kill cyclists by removing safe cycling infrastructure, I've always wondered if there's a reason why cyclists aren't allowed to simply ride through an intersection like the one in the photo.

I'm talking about the right side, where the bike lane could extend through the intersection without interfering with other vehicles, including those that are turning left.

This would not only keep those stops safer (clears the cyclist out of the intersection), but would just make sense from a transportation efficiency standpoint.

Is there something I'm missing, or do cyclists have to stop only because motorists would take a tantrum if they weren't required to?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'd ride through it if nobody is around.

I'm not taking chances that someone won't swing too wide and smash into me if there's traffic though.

Exception is oncoming traffic, because they won't be closer than 20ft to me unless they're aiming

People are dumb. Expect them to do dumb things and you'll live longer.