this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
17 points (79.3% liked)

Fediverse

17677 readers
27 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A response to Daring Fireball's recent thinkpieces about Fediverse admins wanting to block Meta's new ActivityPub platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

@deadsuperhero Why the ad hominem in the title? Completely unnecessary, and actually proving his point about pettiness.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You don't know what you're talking about.

/s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@NettoHikari Says a person who does unpaid work for Condé Nast? In order to prove the same point again? Cool.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@NettoHikari Ah OK. Wasn't aware of that shorthand. First time I've ever seen it on fedi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, as you guessed right, I'm a Reddit refugee. Pretty common on there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Probably true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, if I wanted to be petty, I would've called him an idiot. This is an opinion piece focused on the idea that he's uninformed on the nuance of the situation.

I promise, this is in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@deadsuperhero Just because you disagree with some things, and you've been here from the start, doesn't mean someone doesn't know what they're talking about. And even if that would be the case, it's an unnecessary insult that makes the recipients of the counterarguments less receptive to whatever is being laid out below.

So if it's in good faith, then I think that's just a poor choice of title. Only wanted to point that out. Feel free to ignore it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But he doesn't know what he's talking about. Either that, or he's knowingly spouting bullshit in bad faith.

So I guess he could just be a liar. But I doubt that's what you mean.