this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
453 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
60047 readers
2833 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Conspiracy to blank requires at least one overt action, demonstrating that you intend to fulfill your commitment to blank.
We could talk about doing blank all day, make plans to blank. Draw up little blank maps and assign blank duties. Until someone actually does something, it's all just talk.
So, who wants to plan the next presidential assassination?
Intention doesn’t require action.
Your peers do not operate in a binary fashion.
No but you still gotta prove it. That and freedom of speech is a thing.
I can say I plan to go and do any old crime, I can talk about it with my friends who might give me ideas. They might even volunteer to help.
Until someone actually does something, all we're doing is talking. We're protected by the first amendment, and it would be damn near impossible to prove we actually intended to do anything.
Unless we're threatening elected officials. They tend to embed themselves, push for the plot, and still wait until they make an attempt to act on the conspiracy that they're kind of responsible for.
Chris Hansen enters the room: "go ahead and have a seat"
Notably, they had to actually show up at the house before the cops took any action.
An overt action can be pretty simple, but it does have to happen.
Yep.
My mandatory reporting is based on my interpretation of their intent not their actions.
Sure, let the courts decide but that doesn’t quite equate to what precedes.