this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
56 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

5278 readers
806 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I find this hilarious. Is this an easter egg? When shaking my mouse cursor, I can get it to take up the whole screens height.

This is KDE Plasma 6.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

Why would shaking the cursor make it bigger in the first place? Is this an accessibility feature to find the cursor?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Yeah, and Windows and OS X both do it as well.

Though there being no upper limit to the size is amusing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Can't tell if lazy programming or just figuring it will fix itself. In theory there would be a point of overflow maybe? Well, I guess that also fixes itself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I assume the KDE implementation resizes to default when you stop shaking it.

I could totally see someone coding a function that increases the mouse pointer by x% every y mouse shakes, and then neglecting to put in a size cap.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I could totally see someone coding a function that increases the mouse pointer by x% every y mouse shakes, and then neglecting to put in a size cap.

This feature used to be in KDE 5 as well though, but with a size cap. I suspect the removal of the size cap is intentional rather than a bug.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Yes, it resets once motion is stopped. It's one of those things where without comments in the code or something you could also assume forgetting to check one of the bounds just happened to work fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)