this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
150 points (95.7% liked)

Pleasant Politics

208 readers
4 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read [email protected] for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Applying the law but wanting it to change is what is called "rule of law" and democracy. Not understanding it is a part of what makes it so easy to slide into fascism.

"Nuance" my ass. Expecting a DA to follow its conviction instead of the law is the opposite of what you want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's what I was getting at. Frankly, I wouldn't want a DA or any cop-adjacent to run the country. Better her than the Orange Turd, but I'm splitting hairs here.

Anyone should have been a shoe-in against him. But they weren't. She wasn't. It wasn't a single factor. We will scream until we're blue in the face, pun intended, but in the end, the Dems fucked this.

The candidate they ran was not better than Trump at connecting with the populace. As a result, we got a false populist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A female DA against a rapist who should be in jail. I don't know in what universe it wasnt a good match.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ours. You're in it.