this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Geopolitics

333 readers
3 users here now

The study of how factors such as geography, economics, military capability and non-State actors affects the foreign policy of states.

All articles will require a short submission statement of 3-5 sentences.

Use the article title as the submission title. Do not editorialize the title or add your own commentary to the article title.

In this community we encourage long, in-depth submissions. Submissions should not be news articles that merely provide quick updates on current events; instead they should include background information and an explanation as to why the events they describe are occurring.

Submissions should not be about an individual country's domestic policies. Instead, they should be about relationships between different countries and/or relevant international organizations. Things like breakaway politics are permitted in this subreddit, as they are relevant to and could affect the geopolitical system.

Submissions are strongly encouraged to come from reputable sources. When posting from a lesser known source, please check whether the authors have some sort of qualification demonstrating they are knowledgeable of the subjects they discuss.

Sources that include (or solely contain) maps, statistics, or other multimedia (videos, interviews, primary sources, etc.) are permitted and even encouraged in this subreddit.

We encourage discussion and welcome anyone to pose hypotheses and ask questions. We allow self-posts.

We encourage comments to be cited.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ehh this article is poorly argued, there's way better writing on China's economic performance.

The author starts by just ranting about things they dislike (DEI initiatives, preventing the spread of a pandemic) rather than building a case for these factors being causal. It's also got some casual/unaddressed anti-communism in it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah I've seen better articles as well, but I find an admission of chauvinism from a source that's clearly biased in this way is itself interesting. Seems like it's finally starting to dawn on western mainstream that China isn't an inferior who can only copy from them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah, read against the grain there are some useful insights and it's certainly a weathervane for how the more business savvy people in the west are beginning to see China. Still, I don't think the author has a good understanding for what is causing a drain on productivity in the west (i.e., i don't think it's COVID measures and DEI) and so I'd take their other analyses with a heavy grain of salt too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

For sure, for me the most interesting part was to see that business people are starting to realize that the narrative about China isn't holding up. In terms of actual analysis, I completely agree that it's been done much better by smarter people.