1853
Decision Time (infosec.pub)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
310 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Under an authorisation government though I assume the law would be rescinded, so it's not really protecting anybody.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean becoming an authoritarian government to prevent an authoritarian government doesn't really make sense

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's like saying we shouldn't send anyone to prison because some of them might be innocent. You have to try your best with a system but that system has to be robust enough that it cannot be abused otherwise it will end up being abused.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    If you want a system that cannot be abused then don't remove the safeguards designed to fix mistakes.

    Allowed innocents to be released from prison, and allow the disenfranchised to regain their voting rights.

    This is why there is always a higher power to overrule previous decisions, and when it comes to elections there is no higher power than a majority.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent