this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

15289 readers
64 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm tired with this anti-cheat trend. It's not a confirmation of any sort but still.. i don't want Dark and Darker to be "borked" for gaming on Linux.

With some many companies considering that option, is this far more effective for an anti-cheat ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"I'm OK with companies using incredibly shitty, intrusive software practices because I don't think they'll affect me personally" is such a shit take for so many reasons, to name a few:

  1. giving software kernel access, especially when it does not or should not need kernel access, is a security risk, and does open the door for malicious actors to take advantage of vulnerabilities even if the software is not malicious in and of itself

  2. occasionally, intensively intrusive programs like this do break things unintentionally, which can lead to all sorts of fun issues. StarForce DRM is a good example from years past.

  3. just because you do not have anything on your PC that you consider sensitive, does not mean that applies to everyone.

  4. Kernel level anticheat can be bypassed. It's usually not cheap/easy, but it can and has been done. Meaning, for all of the above concessions you make, there is no real benefit.

these are just the few I can think of immediately.