this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
58 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

A very poor Lemmy article headline. The linked article says “alleged” and clearly there were multiple factors involved.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The title is straight from the article

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is odd. It’s not what I see:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Could be different headlines for different regions?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Or they changed the headline and due to caches CDNs or other reasons you didn’t get the newer one.

archive.today has your original headline cached.

Thanks for posting. While it’s a needlessly provocative headline, if that’s what the article headline was, then that is what the Lemmy one should be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They most likely changed the headline because the original headline was so bad.

If people are still seeing old headline, it's probably cached. Try a hard refresh or a different browser or a private browser, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)