this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
398 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58810 readers
4826 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

This is not me defending any telecom, but locking subsidized phones during the contract period, is one of the only reasonably legitimate use cases for carrier locking.

And the reason is simple, fraud. Carrier locked phones that have been reported for fraud/nonpayment, can't be used off network. It doesn't help recover the cost for the carrier, but it does deter that type of fraud.

Whereas unlocked phones can just be taken to another network, which means they're resale value is worth the effort to steal in the first place.

Now, all that is true, but that doesn't mean I'm in favor of it, or that telecoms have ever made unlocking fully paid phones easy, they haven't, so fuck them.

And before anyone points it out, yes, I'm aware locked phones still have have value for fraud, but that fraud typically has a higher threshold for entry, as it involves having the contacts who can leverage overseas black markets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not even unlocked phones can be used on another (us) carrier if reported stolen, all IMEIs associated with the device are blacklisted across all legal carriers in the country.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, they are not. Blacklists are per carrier, at least when dealing with American primary carriers, and not MVNOs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's nationwide, all carriers and mvnos are signed on to the US Block Status since IMEI became standard. It's a separate list from the global GSMA and not all carriers in the US report to the GSMA like they should,but if a device is reported lost or stolen in the US it cannot be activated by a US carrier until resolved.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Except I have used unlocked IMEI blacklisted devices on different carriers, so if one exists in theory, it doesn't appear to be there in practice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Depending on what state you're in, you admitted to fraud or possession of stolen goods, so maybe don't admit that. That aside yeah some carriers can fail to submit to the US Block Status but generally those instances are rare given the activating carrier can be legally liable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

I'm not admitting to any crime. There are other ways to come into possession of blacklisted IMEI devices, and other ways for them to become blacklisted that don't involve either of those scenarios.

Why don't you go pull up all those FCC fines leveied on carriers for activating blacklisted phones.