People's Court

458 readers

1 users here now

This is a community for Lemmygrad users and admins to discuss administrative issues in a more transparent manner

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-7

Should loli posting be allowed? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically as title, I wanted to hear if posts such as below are acceptable, since as it stands, it doesn't break any of Lemmygrads rules. Frankly, the post is very weird to me, and the comments are bizarre. People talking about how they want to "dominated" by a 14 year old is imo not okay, especially not when it's on a post of a drawing of a child with clear undertones. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the post since I'm not an evangelion fan, but I thought it was noteworthy enough to bring up here.

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5810839

EDIT: The post has been removed, so I guess that's a no?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Even calling it "loli" is problematic and if anything the creepier thing, but IMO

(A) in the genchat we talked about the age of those two posters (my comment on the other hand was "sure kill me" but less explicit as it's the grad)

(B) the line drawn is iffy with age (not an Evangelion fan so didn't know she's 14) but even then at some point, considering the artstyle and that we're literally gunning for "undertones" at this point I think we need to touch grass.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

Hm, it's not problematic calling it Loli and definitely not creepy. Lolicon isn't just porn, but attraction towards children in general, is it not?

There's no gunning for undertones. If you replace the cartoon image with an actual photograph of a child it should be obvious.

The age of the commenters is irrelevant.

a) Their age is unverified

b) Readers don't know their age

c) The OC was likely created by an adult

I don't know if the character depicted is said to be 14, I was referencing u/commiespammer's comment

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Lolicon isn’t just porn, but attraction towards children in general, is it not?

Yes and no, "loli" is the.. genre if you will. The terminally online/creepy/anime way of calling it. Calling people or kids it in general is just plain wrong honestly IMO. The "attraction towards children" is pedophilia

There’s no gunning for undertones. If you replace the cartoon image with an actual photograph of a child it should be obvious.

Once again, cartoon. Not to say that makes "everything ok" but at some point you need to touch grass

The age of the commenters is irrelevant.

As for this... seriously? They were cringe but this is equally cringe. Basically at some point... you get my gist

c) The OC was likely created by an adult

I don't see how this has anything to do with the subject matter?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Once again, cartoon. Not to say that makes “everything ok” but at some point you need to touch grass

At what point do you need to touch grass and at what point does it make "everything ok"?

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (12 replies)