GenZedong

4269 readers

93 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Was slavery a necessary step in the development and evolution of human civilization like capitalism is? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please don't take this question the wrong way, I am just trying to learn and get the opinions of more people on this subject. I find it interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The "terrible swift sword" that forced hunter-gatherers into the wheat fields was maybe necessary for economy of scale early agriculture, yeah.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I can see the argument, but the amount of free labor it takes to maintain a slave system is so high (especially when there isn't much in the way of technology) that significant slavery at the dawn of agriculture seems unlikely. Seems like that's something you could only start to pull off with a decent sized city state's worth of overseer labor, and at that point you've already had agriculture for a while.