PC Gaming

8392 readers

492 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Paradox on Bloodlines 2: "We had a game we could do, but maybe not with the team we had" (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Archive link doesn't work for me, but I could extract the original link and read it.

Don't really take much joy from anything Paradox is saying about the direction and developer switch. It plays more like Dishonored? That's not what made the first game so good brother, why'd you throw out Brian Mitsoda when you had him working on the project and the writing is half of what made people love the original? Why did The Chinese Room toss out Rik Schaffer when the soundtrack of the original was so iconic?

It might turn out to be a decent game but I have such a hard time believing it will be a good Bloodlines game.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

This reminds me of Bioware and Dragon Age, they changed everything for the second game and completely ignored why fans loved the first one.