Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Yeah that was a real oof moment
I wish the other debates were as enjoyable as this one. Both people tried to answer the questions and treated each other with respect and empathy. I think both men came off as sincere and decent.
I’m actually inclined to agree. It’s unfortunate one of them is a theofascist piece of shit.
Nah walz isn’t that bad. He’s just naive. He’s a simple man. He didn’t mean to go fascist but thought he was doing the right thing. I’d rather see a ticket if vanz and walz myself.
There’s that good ole conservative projection in action