this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
140 points (82.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44144 readers
1440 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just curious because I donโ€™t see people talk about it a lot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Atsc 3.0 requires an internet connection for it's bullshit DRM

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Woww, over the air broadcasts with copy protection? ๐Ÿคฎ

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

It's like they want OTA TV to die off.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That seems entirely pointless then, why not just stream the content.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Bandwidth is cheaper from the tower since the signal is the "same" for each client and it can then be distributed over a wide area. You send the "DRM" (Just a fancy encryption key) over the network since it's relatively small and likely unique to each device (probably fingerprinting the device ids to the content invisibily in case of piracy).

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Multicast is a thing, though it doesn't seem to be widespread. That would make a lot more sense than this weird DRM broadcast system.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Multicast still requires more expensive less widespread bandwidth than sending out analog signals ota & shooting off a few packets of encryption information every now and then. US infrastructure has rapidly improved over the past few years, but we're still a farcry from anything robust and reliable enough to serve the people benefiting from this type of content.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Having the receiver phone home would have the benefit of generating more accurate viewership data, where broadcast tv has historically relied on representative cohorts.