24
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Come on, you're more well-read than this. You know that military occupation and annexation are not the same thing.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

You still haven't answered what you think the intent of the military action was. Do you claim any military confrontation is occupation?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I'd more say that the military occupation was done for the sake of confrontation (this is similar to the official Chinese line). It was a really senseless invasion, as far as I can tell (and I disagree with the Vietnamese line that the war was expansionist).

[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I think we can agree on that

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
24 points (59.5% liked)

Socialism

5987 readers
9 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS