Fediverse

8 readers

2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago

Within the Fediverse, can any federated activitypub-compliant instance read data from any other instance? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apologies in advance if I am using the wrong terms or posting the wrong way.

Onto my question, I see that despite being on kbin.social, I see articles for lemmy.world and other platforms on this site. Did the admins of each instance configure this, or does it occur because they are all public and each instance fetches data from everywhere else?

The reason I'm curious is because I'm wondering about building a read-only instance for myself. Hosting an instance of kbin/lemmy/etc comes with a lot of extra functionality (users management, communities, content uploads, etc), along with associated costs (storage, scaling). I imagine having a instance that simply reads other federated instances, caches their posts/comments temporarily, with minimal storage for configuration (subscribed topics/people/etc).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did the admins of each instance configure this, or does it occur because they are all public and each instance fetches data from everywhere else

The softwares can federate with whomever by default, so your second thought was spot on.

The reason I’m curious is because I’m wondering about building a read-only instance for myself.

This is a perfectly valid reason to stand up your own lemmy/kbin server. I'm considering the same thing myself. An instance like you're describing would certainly need far fewer resources compared to a public instance, just keep in mind that you'll need to set up and maintain it on your own; not a huge task for a single user, but it's a task.

And to be a bit more clear on the terminology, you're considering setting up an instance that has new user signups and new communities disabled, but with federation still enabled, correct? If not, than disregard everything in my last paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Rather than a kbin/lemmy instance, I'm thinking of a separate codebase altogether.
As I understand, both kbin and lemmy implement the activitypub protocol, similar to how gmail/outlook implement SMTP.
So having an activitypub-compliant app would be sufficient to read the data from kbin/lemmy/etc.
This would be a side project for myself to learn a new language, e.g. golang backend.