Everyone knows that electric vehicles are supposed to be better for the planet than gas cars. That's the driving reason behind a global effort to transition toward batteries.

But what about the harms caused by mining for battery minerals? And coal-fired power plants for the electricity to charge the cars? And battery waste? Is it really true that EVs are better?

The answer is yes. But Americans are growing less convinced.

The net benefits of EVs have been frequently fact-checked, including by NPR. "No technology is perfect, but the electric vehicles are going to offer a significant benefit as compared to the internal combustion engine vehicles," Jessika Trancik, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told NPR this spring.

It's important to ask these questions about EVs' hidden costs, Trancik says. But they have been answered "exhaustively"


her word


and a widerange of organizations have confirmed that EVs still beat gas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Put them in a sealed room with a gas engine running and you'll see how fast they realize that they're cleaner

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Fair, but the first rebuttal is going to be "go into a sealed room with a coal fire burning"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    The argument is that all you're doing is moving the carbon emissions from the car directly in your vicinity to the coal-fired power plant a long distance away. Move that same coal-fired power plant into the sealed room, and suddenly it's no longer far away, and the "unclean" nature of the electric car, so the thought process goes, becomes obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    That's the thought process if you just stop thinking when you get to a point that reaffirms one's biases. If you continue down that train of thought you'd realize it's a lot easier to regulate and monitor the emissions of a coal power plant than it is every single car on the road. Plus you don't need to use coal to make electricity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Isn't the whole point that the gas engine equivalent is just in somebody else's room though?

    In any case, I'll take whatever partial climate wins we can get.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Even if we assume all the electricity is coming from carbon sources (there's no need for any of it to be carbon sources) it's still more efficient because power plants are way better at turning that chemical energy into electricity. Even with the losses in the lines, charging, and in your motors, electric cars are still significantly more efficient on a mile per kg CO2 basis than gas cars. Throw some solar panels on your roof and they become essentially carbonless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments