this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

History

4289 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/16751749

UK National Archive

The Householder’s Handbook explained how to prepare a home for nuclear attack: Whitewash the house, tape windows and create a safe core in one of the rooms. It listed medicines, food, and supplies needed and explained what to do if there was a nuclear attack. Householders would be able to occupy themselves and their families in preparing for the worst.

Even before the 80’s version, Protect and Survive and the CND peace movement’s riposte – Protest and Survive, the handbook seemed remarkably naïve. A 20-megaton bomb detonated 500 feet above St Paul’s Cathedral in central London would have created a blast wave destroying or damaging buildings for up to 17 kilometres and deliver a lethal dose of radiation for nearly five kilometres.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As the UK National Archives comment under it. “[it] seemed remarkably naive”. And it was. Guess they were focusing more on trying not to freak people out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like many similar government programs, it was thoughtfully designed.

The biggest risk in any national emergency is panic. As seen recently with Covid and earlier, when a rumour toilet roll supplies running out. Mass panic trigger irrational behaviour en masse which is bad news all round.

Second thing, and related I suppose, is the fear level of the populace. If the message is That “things will be difficult but good old British common sense will prevail, while the government sorts things out for you”. The government keeps people, voters, on side . Alternatively, the government come under a lot more scrutiny if it’s widely understood to be ‘game over’ if war in not averted.

So while you cannot rely on these to be truthful or factually accurate, or even designed to keep you alive , you can be reasonably be sure it’s part of a plan.

In 196 Raymond Briggs wrote a graphic novel , which became a movie - called “when the wind blows” that pretty much nailed this.

There are clips on YouTube but nothing substantial. If you get chance to see it - do so.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t think the worst part of the covid pandemic was a shortage of toilet paper. I would have guessed it’s the tens of millions who died and were disabled for life, and still are being more and more every day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, panic clearly wasn't the biggest issue with covid. There were MANY problems, governments didn't handle it well, etc, but the virus itself and its deadliness received a very mild reaction after all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not publishing leaflets about nuclear attacks would freak me out less!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think it’s more about giving people who were already scared an illusion of safety and control. But that’s just my opinion.