this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
9 points (90.9% liked)

Canada

7186 readers
345 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
9
One of the military's simplest procurement projects is being tied down by red tape (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Despite facing heavy pressure to ramp up military spending, the Department of National Defence (DND) has slow-rolled one of the least complex of its vehicle replacement programs.

The light utility vehicle program has been on the books for several years. Its purpose is to update the military's fleet of two-decade-old Afghan war-era Mercedes G-Wagons and civilian-grade utility vehicles, such as pickups and SUVs.

The light utility vehicle program isn't as high-tech as some other military procurement projects β€” but it's still a perfect example of how a procurement system petrified of making mistakes can take a very long time to get anything done, said Steve Saideman, a defence expert at Carleton University.

"We'd rather have no corruption and slow purchases rather than [moving] fast and [accepting] more risk of making mistakes," he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Uh... I'm fine with this. Look at the US to see what no oversight gets you - if it takes longer and we waste less money that's alright.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If only we wasted less money. Every item procured is late and costs more than anticipated.

Look at the new AOPs that Irving is fumbling though making. They're delivered with massive deficiencies, can't do half of what was on the contract, and somehow are out of warranty so Irving won't pay for the repairs? Seems reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Irving should be banned from bidding on any Canadian contracts ever again.

And before the nationalists jump in, I don't gaf if they're the only Canadian company capable of jobs like this. If they can't do it right they can listen to Al.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One could argue that they aren't capable of these types of jobs due to the end product being a fucking half billion dollar joke a piece.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yup. The whole Irving empire is just one big cesspool that should be broken up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

More significantly, the estimated cost of the program has risen to somewhere between $750 million and $1 billion, from an initial projection of $499 million.