this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
995 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

10340 readers
1202 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
995
i will never understand scientific fraud (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

like you go to the not-believing-until-seeing convention with lies and what? expect to get away with it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Simple - does anything threaten the housing and food? If yes, can NATO stop it? If yes, then yay NATO. Any other case? No thank you.

Demilitarizing the world won't happen in a night, but we all know NATO won't agree to it, so it will have to go eventually.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would argue belligerent nations waging war on agricultural nations, for example Ukraine, is a threat to food and housing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well there we go!

In ideal world, things like that would not be necessary, but as we know, asking countries to destroy their weapons never leads to their prosperity... so fuck that, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't ask about Ideal world NATO, I asked about NATO which implies the context of reality we currently live in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did I not answer that question in my first comment? Wait - I did.

I then tried to hint that (as my first comment actually started), we as species should try to build a better world, focusing on providing the minimum for everyone before giving very few everything there is.

Is NATO perfect? No, it sucks, but we currently won't do any better. Like nothing I keep repeating all over here.

But I wish we stopped everything, and I mean everything apart from housing and basic food, to actually solve the climate crisis.

And, ironic as it is, stopping everything would actually be the best thing right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Building a better world involves unconditional support of mutual defence pacts such as NATO. Once you've eliminated the cause for NATO, then dissolving NATO will make sense. Building a better world without NATO just sounds like some Putin/CCP Cocksucking in the context of our reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Once you’ve eliminated the cause for NATO, then dissolving NATO will make sense.

The cause for NATO was eliminated. NATO didn't dissolve. It grew. Spoiler alert: there are no good guys in a war between imperialists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yes yes yes, that is exactly what I mean the entire time, thank you for understanding it. We ALL should agree to forget losers, psychopaths, and everyone who want to have power over others, and focus on problems of the weakest ones first and foremost.