Technology

59434 readers

3363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

279

Servo Browser Now Supports Tabbed Browsing, WAV Audio Files. (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

~~While I do agree, he has sourced and linked all statements~~

Edit: ._. What does any of that have to do with Andreas, ladybird or Serenity.

I do not care if you have some sort of hate for the blogger, all the statements made in the article are sourced. You're acting like the blogger is attacking you specifically or something.

Andreas said it simple (While in different words). What does your sex have to do with the project? Absolutely nothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

all the statements made in the article are sourced.

If only his sources matter, link those instead. Bringing in Lunduke's article means bringing in his views. That's not some special Lunduke-hate-boner property, if anyone linked an Israeli news website in a thread about Gaza, I'd call that ridiculous too. Articles reflect their authors, and you happened to pick one of the worst authors in tech.

You're acting like the blogger is attacking you specifically or something.

Because Lunduke's ideas can cause real damage to people's lives, and I'm tired of seeing them. Again, I'm sorry if I come across as affronted—this genuinely, deeply frustrates me. And it's hard to hold that down.

I don't blame you. I don't know how you found the article, or how you read it. But please reconsider sharing Lunduke's stuff. The man's one step away from conspiracy theorist, or hell, maybe he counts as one already.

Andreas said it simple (While in different words). What does your sex have to do with the project? Absolutely nothing.

"In different words" is doing a lot of work, there. But that's a great point you made, sex has nothing to do with the project. So why did he reject a simple change which only made sex even less relevant?

And I ask again: which other side is Lunduke representing that you felt was important to include?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Apologies, I added a lot to my comment in an edit before I saw your reply. Regardless, which other side is Lunduke representing that's important to share?