Technology

59064 readers

3608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

“Intersectional hallucinations”: The AI flaw that could lead to dangerous misinformation (www.psypost.org)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (4 children)

However, training these AI models needs a LOT of data, so much that some of it has to be synthetic – not real data from real people, but data that reproduces existing patterns. Most synthetic datasets are themselves generated by Machine Learning AI.

Maybe having a blind man teach another blind man how to see based on how he imagines seeing works is a recipe for disaster...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Turns out analogies are not the actual thing they're analogizing, though. Synthetic data - when properly created and curated - has proven to be very useful and effective in training AI.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Except when it's not, or else this article would have no point.

ETA: also, it seems like a terrible idea to train science models on data you essentially invented. The reason science works is because it follows the extant evidence, not the other way around.

load more comments (1 replies)