Comics

5940 readers

120 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

If possible, give us your sources.
If possible, credit creators of each comics in the title or body of your post. If you are the creator, please credit yourself. A simple “- Me” would suffice.
In general terms, write in body of your post as much information as possible (dates, creators, editors, links).
If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the ‘Link’ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
One post by topic.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

755

“Communism bad” (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

721 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Communism doesn't work on a large-scale, and it's not sustainable.

Have you ever heard of little thing called "economy of scale"? The bigger scale is - the more sustainable it is.

By it's very nature it's extremely prone to abuse, and fundamentally impossible to install any sort of checks and balances on a single party-system.

"checks and balances" do not prevent abuse. They are not designed to.

Look how bad it is with a two-party system in the US.

In my opinion two-party system is worse than single-party system and full pluralism. In single-party system there is only one party to blame, while in many-parties system no party can control discourse. While in two-party system both parties can agree to screw over people and finger-point at each-other, only creating illusion of pluralism.

And that besides societal issues two-party system creates like strong polarization.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

while in many-parties system no party can control discourse

As someone living in a country having many-party system, the discourse is perfectly controllable in the same way they are doing it in US, just with tiny extra effort. Since 1989 we didn't had even a single anticapitalist party in parliament despite having sometimes over a dozen of them for several years. Hell in current term we have the most parties - 17 parties + 42 independent parliamentarists on 460 seats in sejm, and still what we hear from all of them is similar on every base question - no alternative to capitalism, neoliberalism in practice, and complete submission to USA and EU in all manners.