EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Russia has 5000 nukes, if the US is not involved, Europe will be toast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    NATO would ensure that the US is involved. We're aligned with the Europeans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    Doesn’t Drumpf plan to remove us from NATO? Or am I remembering wrongly what I read?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah, well. He is going to prison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    He will never see a second in prison, don’t kid yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments