you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children)

Oh! I took it as a joke, but reading it back, i see it can be read both ways. If OP was being serious, then they need a reality check.

Not to diminish that geoguessers ability. Ive seen a bunch of his videos, and it is crazy how good he is at identifying things like architecture, roads, grass, trees, signs, electrical infrastructure, etc. If there was anything but a white wall behind the person they are trying to find, then this is the guy i would ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Google Earth is not a live feed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Did i say it was?

    Does it need to be for the techniques the geoguesser uses to work?

    No and... no...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    You made the claim that he can tell the CIA were they can find Russian spies by using geoguessing. I’m saying that’s a very childish and subcomplex understanding of reality - probably because your cultural inclination to think of reality as part of the MCU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    No, i didn't, i said i thought the person that actually made that claim was joking. And that if they weren't, then they needed help.

    I then said that despite this, the particular geoguesser is really talented and that if there were any clues and it wasn't just a white wall, then this is the guy i would bet on finding the location.

    I didn't need to even say this again. it's all there in my previous post.

    Maybe you have mixed me up with OP?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment