Science Memes

10988 readers

1895 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

872

Peer review (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Was lucky to contribute to a paper for the first time recently and was certainly suprised to see what peer reviews looked like lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it better or worse than code reviews in programming? Typically, if it's 5 lines, we scrutinize everything. If it's 500 lines, it's a quick scan with a "looks good" comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd say its similar. Though from the limited dataset of peer reviews I have, I'd say that peer reviews are more informative / detailed while code reviews usually have way less typos lol.